Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by SuperNinKenDo 9 days ago
Actually, strictly speaking, it's /more/ debatable. Using eminent domain to seize land for the data centre itself gets a much more generally negative reaction, while seizing it for the purpose of infrastructure to supply said datacentre - and therefore, at least arguably, alleviate strain on the infrastructure used by everyone else - has more nuance and more room for debate.
1 comments

Data centers increase strain on the grid, so their supply lines do too.
Data centers are a fixed load with on-site backup generators that can be used to shed load when the grid is stressed. Grids actually like that sort of thing. It lets them use more cheap renewables.
That makes no sense. Building new grid increases strain on the grid? No, it reduces strain, that's why they're doing it.
Without explanation, you think power plants aren't "the grid" that's being strained?
I think the grid is the grid, you know, the system of interconnections between electricity producers and consumers.
You learn something new every day.