Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by OrvalWintermute 11 days ago
I think this manifesto conflates Palantir with:

The CIA

The NSA

JSOC

The US Armed Forces

Weapons Contractors

Law Enforcement

Federal Counter-Intelligence

Various dictatorships

Criminal Enterprises

Hit squads

3 comments

In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s investment arm, was early investor into Palantir.

"The company has found itself at the center of a topic that has become especially important for the United States: how to use AI in defense, intelligence and government management. Palantir has historically been close to this market. Its early investor was In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s investment arm, and its largest customers for a long time were U.S. government agencies and the military. That connection has become even stronger: last year, Palantir had nearly $900 million in contracts with the Pentagon, and earlier the company received a U.S. Army contract worth up to $10 billion over 10 years."

https://tradersunion.com/news/editors-picks/show/1992613-pal...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palantir

The same could be said about Oracle though, that they received the benfits of early investment by the CIA.

However scary Oracle license auditors are though, no one conflates them with the CIA.

We're now in an era where people are actively trying to compare a contractor doing some type of IT support, to a company.

Palantir is de-facto military contractor and the Palantir CEO knows it.

"“Our product is used, on occasion, to kill people,” Karp said in an interview with news website Axios in 2020."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChwSTuDa9RY

https://www.sciencefocus.com/future-technology/inside-palant...

That is hyperbole as Palantir doesn’t pull the trigger

We could easily say: Microsoft, Red Hat, NVIDIA, Apple, Google, openAI, Amazon & Meta are all defense contractors too

Could Palantir be compared with Raytheon? A major U.S. defense contractor and industrial corporation with manufacturing concentrations in weapons and military and commercial electronics. Raytheon makes air traffic control systems, radars and sensors, satellite sensors, missile defense systems, missiles.
Palantir pioneered forward-deployed engineering, aren’t they deeply embedded in the above?
They (maybe) pioneered forward-deployed software engineers. They certainly didn't pioneer sending engineers, or other experts, to help integrate systems.
no one is going to conflate a Palantir FDE with an actual pipehitter

Contractors doing IT support aren't "Operators" in the tactical sense, nor agents in the LE sense, nor Officers in the IC sense, nor a Boeing/Lockheed/Leidos/etc type developing weapons.

This is just a new method to scapegoat a company

Kind of a problem though, if that’s who you’re getting mixed up with.