Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nomel 13 days ago
So, extend what they said to cover a 50 year timespan? "Instantaneous" wasn't mentioned or implied.
1 comments

If it’s 50 years and gradual, there will be many places very close. The only “winner takes all” scenario is a sudden breakthrough when nobody else is close.

Because it’s a gradient, not a binary.

If gradually one of these labs ends up with the top model that makes all the others uncompetitive, what's the difference? Why do you see time as important if the end result is the same? Winner still takes all, no?