[applfanboysbgon]

> Honestly, I wish more of the discussion had been about the technical side of the project.

Then you would do well to spend a few hours during your three year project to write up a technical description that indicates you actually understand what you've published. Saying you don't speak English natively is a cop-out. LLMs are subpar at translation but if prompted to translate correct technical writing, the output would not have been what's on your front page. You can't possibly present poor technical writing and then expect people to give you more than what you gave them. And yet, I think people did spend more time writing about the technical writing than you did in prompting.

> At some point I realized that arguing about whether a project was "made by AI" or not is a bottomless pit

> Using AI to polish a website doesn’t mean the compiler itself was generated by AI. I think that’s an important distinction.

I notice you don't actually say this isn't AI-generated. You try to heavily imply it isn't with selective wording, yet stop short of denying that it is. And with a fully AI web design, fully AI descriptions, incorrect technical writing, no source code - why would anybody believe otherwise?