[LoganDark]

I'm really not sure how that's a counterexample. The section is called machine learning, not AI. Machine learning is a useful tool for artificial intelligence, so I'd be surprised if a book about AI did not talk about it.

[awwaiid]

I'm saying that Machine Learning was borne of AI from the very beginning. ML has become specialized enough that we may later (much much later) declare it somehow larger/separate/overlapping, but it originated from AI as the generic umbrella.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning

[fragmede]

Machine learning is just what we call AI that works.

[LoganDark]

Math is just what we call a video game that works. What?

[LoganDark]

Oh, maybe you were referring to reliability of the system (i.e. in contrast to how LLMs are famously unreliable). Maybe?