Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by foobarqux 11 days ago
Yes that's the obvious thing to do and why straightforward variants of known tests would also be treated as contaminated by anyone being even somewhat rigorous.

I don't know why the standard is is to be sure that it is happening versus it being a plausible risk of making the results useless.

1 comments

The pelican test has never pretended to be "rigorous". It's always openly been very much not that.