|
|
|
|
|
by PaulDavisThe1st
11 days ago
|
|
> But I just hate this idea that truth and facts are no longer real, they're just "directions". There's another way to look at this which is just as pernicious, and you've already mentioned it. That's the idea that "truth" is the consensus of the training data. Even if you include several layers of meta-training-data (i.e training data that comments on the accuracy/truthfulness of other training data), this idea that we can get truth by just carrying out some aggregate operation across (everything|a lot of stuff) seems completely obviously false to me. |
|