[joemi]

It's a lot smaller of a community than HN, so it will naturally have a smaller range of opinions merely due to the fact that it has a lot fewer users.

That said, I don't believe it's as much of a hivemind as you've portrayed. I've seen dissenting opinions voiced there which weren't downvoted (or at least not noticeably), while the same opinion in a similar thread here on HN would be downvoted and flagged. So I don't think that getting downvoted enough so that you're invited to delete your account is a common occurrence with productive members.

[flomo]

It's fine not to be an AI user, just some people there seem to be holding their breath and stomping their feet until it goes away. Which leads to a really repetitive and boring discussion. (I'm not a member there, but they often have better technical links vs HN.)

[OutOfHere]

With regard to its small size, that's not why. They have for a long while been actively and intentionally hostile to AI.

[CursedSilicon]

I love it already!

[moron4hire]

Nice. I'll go check it out. Thanks.

[maxloh]

Hi. Could you send me an invite? Email in my profile :)

[abetusk]

Invitation sent. Let me know if you didn't get it.

[maxloh]

I have successfully singed up. Thank you very much!

[Aurornis]

> So I don't think that getting downvoted enough so that you're invited to delete your account is a common occurrence with productive members.

It is! It’s a rite of passage on the site if you dare comment anything that someone might disagree with.

There have been several high profile cases of valued members getting fed up with it and leaving the site. One example where even the community was starting to question if this is really what they want: https://lobste.rs/s/zp4ofg

[hagbard_c]

I don't think it is a much a hive mind but it is - or at least was - susceptible to manipulation by individuals who know how to game the system to push their own narrative. I got into a discussion with one of these, a 'furry' who posted semi-relevant articles laced with furry-themed illustrations where those illustrations seemed to be the main point of the articles. After a number of such articles I remarked on this and was banned shortly after, somewhat out of the blue. The moderator did not like this type of 'sensitive' discussion which more or less meant the site was fair game for those willing to abuse it knowing that any discussion on their abuse would be suppressed. Maybe things have changed, maybe they haven't but it did leave me rather disillusioned with the way the place was moderated and as such I haven't been there for years.