[YZF]

As the proud owner of a ZX-81 I remember staring at the Z80 instruction reference at the end of the user's manual without the faintest clue of what any of that meant. It took me some while before I managed to wrap my head around how CPUs actually run programs (vs. the high level abstractions like BASIC or other languages).

[sedatk]

Actually, BASIC’s flat structure helped me a lot in understanding Z80 assembly when I was 12. You see, memory addresses were line numbers, registers were variables, JP was GOTO, CALL was GOSUB. CP was IF, JP, Z was THEN GOTO, and LD was LET, and so forth.

[lelanthran]

> You see, memory addresses were line numbers, registers were variables,

There was only a single[1] register though, the accumulator.

[1] Okay, there was the PC as well. Maybe a flags register too? But only one used for variables, IIRC.

[sedatk]

You seem to be confusing Z80 with 6502.

[lelanthran]

> You seem to be confusing Z80 with 6502.

You're quite correct, I did confuse the two.

Too late to edit it now, but at least your response will stand as a correction.

[xcf_seetan]

Another proud ZX-81 owner, my first computer bought as kit. It made me the TI pioneer in my little city. So cool times, everything was complex and simple at the same time. I had a flight simulator in only 1Kb ram :D

[TheOtherHobbes]

The ZX81's 1k chess - actually 672 bytes - was, and still is, legendary.

[Scubabear68]

That machine was my intro to computers too, and I was fascinated by “fast mode” blanking the screen and the interesting tradeoffs between hardware and software.