[lelanthran]

>>> "Text is simply not information dense enough to be able to decode some arbitrary signal of provenance from it...it's a bad fiction to perpetuate that any of this is anything more than tarot card reading."

>> Not true at all. Pangram is highly effective and has a very low false positive rate.

> So, if the decision from Pangram determined, on every assignment, if you would be expelled from university for plagiarism, would that be acceptable to you regardless of how you actually did the work?

What point are you arguing? Something having a high success rate does not necessarily translate to treating it as a 100% success rate.

[hgoel]

I explained what I was thinking about when asking that here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48940887