|
|
|
|
|
by wzdd
12 days ago
|
|
The article discusses a technique by which the author achieves high accuracy at detecting AI written text. Unless you have a problem with their experimental method, this is the opposite of tarot card reading. > we are well into undetectable sophistication with today's models The article directly contradicts this, as do you, in your previous paragraph: "Sure you might be able to detect today's tells". The article is literally about a technique that detects today's tells. Your comment is mostly expressing doubt that this technique will work reliably in the future, but it's framed as opposition to the article, which it's not: the article is about detecting today's AI-written text, at which it seems to be quite successful. |
|
My neighbour is a teacher. She has a really good idea which of her students uses AI to do their homework but 80% accuracy is not good enough. She'd need to be able to prove it with certainty.