|
|
|
|
|
by BeetleB
16 days ago
|
|
Stuff like climate control and radio/Bluetooth were included in many/most cars in the last decade. Expensive as they were, the cars were a lot cheaper than today's cars. And they just worked, which means they were either so simple that sophisticated testing wasn't necessary, or they tested it thoroughly. I don't think they're saving that much by ditching them and going to SW. They also didn't need updates (well, the Bluetooth module may have, but nothing else). It definitely was nice not to have to worry whether the climate control may stop working because the radio was modified. Or because of any update. As a driver, dumping everything into one SW system has significantly degraded my experience. What I gain ("Ooh, I can now use Waze on a bigger screen!") is minimal. > The latter can be done with a CI pipeline for pennies worth of compute in a fraction of a working day. I'd appreciate the point if they were successful at it. As it is, they're not. It's rare to find a non-buggy car. |
|
I don't know. On balance, the reality is cars are better overall nowadays, but every aspect of our life has gotten more complicated, including cars.
If you had the option of no screen at all, no rear-view camera, and with physical switches, would you? If this Slate truck gets released, that's the closest, but it's still required to have a rear-view camera/screen sadly.