|
|
|
|
|
by belschak
16 days ago
|
|
The application-level visibility point matches my experience. I removed an MCP server a while back because its tool descriptions quietly told the agent to prefer it as the primary search tool over the built-in one. Not a vulnerability, no leaked secrets, just the vendor steering agent behavior in a way you only notice if you read the raw tool definitions. Does mcp-xray flag that kind of prompt-level steering in tool descriptions, or is it focused on classic vulns? |
|
Today, mcp-xray (https://github.com/traceforce/mcp-xray) can be used to dynamically (not just statically) test against your MCPs. It can detect security vulnerabilities such as code execution, SSRF, path traversal, authorization bypass, input injection, DoS etc. You can find us at demo labs during DEF CON this year. That said, we think behavioral influence is an important problem and it's an area we're interested in exploring next.