| > Nope, because they are irrelevant in the scheme of sources of CO2. Tons emitted is all that matters. So if China split up into 200 countries, they are irrelevant? The US and Europe are ahead in cumulative emissions even today. If "tons emitted is all that matters" then that's who is the most responsible. All the carbon is still in the atmosphere. > If you only build renewable to deal with a shortage of fossil fuels, then you’re not addressing global warming. Why the heck not? Whatever happened to "tons emitted is all that matters"? Who cares why you build renewables as long as you build them? > You’re just doing the very normal economic incentive thing. The US reduces emissions because natural gas is cheaper - "The West took steps to fight climate change". China goes solar because it's cheaper - "Well they're just looking out for #1, they don't really care about the environment". Bit of a double standard there, no? > All of the solar tech that China is deploying today is paid for by the hundreds of failed startups pushing the technology forward in the 2000-2012 era. Really they produced panels that cheap in 2012? I didn't see them. And China has produced zero innovations in solar tech or battery tech? > Australia gets a middle finger as well for because they have a shitload of coal You mean the highest per-capita deployer of solar energy today? In your worldview it seems countries are only allowed economic development on your terms that you've set because they make you look better than everyone else. > If more emissions come from manufacture and transport than are saved by the panel+storage, it would have been better for the recipient to burn fossil fuels. Fortunately fictional hypotheticals don't happen, so it's all good. You speak as though producing and transporting fossil fuels is emissions-free. > China is also terrible. The difference is that China has a track record of destruction over the last 25 years And "The West" has a much longer track record than that. Again we see your bias. No one is without blame but you seem eager to assign disproportionate blame to one country because of this bias. > while climatologists screamed from the rooftops And US voters gleefully voted in multiple climate change denying administrations. > That’s the problem with climate change, it doesn’t matter if you increase solar production until you actually get rid of the coal burning. The difference is that China is realistically on a path to end coal burning. The US is not currently on track to stop burning natural gas and gasoline, given its refusal to consider, indeed its active sabotage of, alternatives. |