Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by spwa4 13 days ago
One error: GLM 5.2 beats the best public Gemini model, 3.5 pro.

There's 2 caveats with the rest. First, GLM 5.2 matches those models in "xhigh" effort modes, which has a very low quota on the subscriptions, especially for Claude.

Second, last-gen GPT/Claude means what they release in April/May of 2026. Or to be even more complete/fair:

GLM 5.2 beats what OpenAI released in March 2026 (GPT 5.5 xxhigh), and what Anthropic released in April 2026 (Opus 4.7 xhigh). It is beaten by what OpenAI released in April of 2026 (GPT 5.6 Sol xxhigh) and Anthropic released in May 2026 (Opus 4.8 (the same as "Fable" ?), xhigh effort)

GLM 5.2 was released on Jun 16 and if OpenAI and Anthropic hadn't done those quick releases they would have been beaten on their best available models ...

So great news! Open source now has SOTA performance 3 months after OpenAI/Anthropic/Google. Wow.
1 comments
suprjami 11 days ago
The gap has been steadily closing over time.

Opus 4.8 (May) to Kimi K3 (July) has apparently just dropped it to two months.

China also does efficiency improvements. Qwen 3.6 27B is better than Sonnet 4.5 and you can run it on a couple of gaming video cards. That's incredible. I can do real actual work with this!

As Google said in 2023, none of them have a moat, open weight models will win.

link
spwa4 10 days ago
> As Google said in 2023, none of them have a moat, open weight models will win.

Google, who probably canceled the release of Gemini 3.5 pro to avoid having their best new model perform worse than BOTH GLM 5.2 AND Kimi K3?

I mean how is this anything but an incredible defeat of Google's supposed inventiveness?

link