[pmontra]

I break it down in reverse order to let you understand how I get a gist of that definition

wavefunction, for example light or any particle, this can't be argued.

the complex plane, because? But a complex number is only a pair of numbers and I know that in polar notation it's handy for:

rotation! And I remember that the electric and magnetic components are on orthogonal planes so we are back to complex numbers and maybe the components rotate, but how about neutral particles? But they are not neutral inside. I think that I'm already off track, very lost.

Energy = frequency, because I know that higher frequency photons are more energetic.

Finally, usually we learn about kinetic energy, then E = mc^2 and maybe about the relativistic effects, without the formula. Those things can be understood easily and are taught at school. The jump to angular rotation and the complex plane is something that few people are exposed to and, as I hope to have demonstrated, it's not easy to map to common experiences, which could be inevitable.

[Ono-Sendai]

Hi, fair enough. I've thoroughly immersed myself in this stuff enough that I sometimes don't realise people aren't as familiar with the concepts and jargon. I'm going to write another article that I think should help about the Klein gordon equation, at some point.

See my last article here https://forwardscattering.org/page/Intuitive%20Quantum%20Ele... Although it is a bit technical. next one will start simpler.