|
|
|
|
|
by FlyingSnake
13 days ago
|
|
Comparing Sanskrit to the status of Latin in 17th CE is bit disingenuous and a sign of presentism. Sanskrit enjoyed scholarship since 6th BCE and it was prevalent and commonly used for more than a millennia after that. The various inscriptions found across the subcontinent, and meant for common people are in Sanskrit which disproves this idea that it was not widely used. |
|