|
|
|
|
|
|
by kortilla
16 days ago
|
|
|
Evidence of a process being used is not evidence of bribes in a process. A thing happens in every administration regime where once it becomes clear that X is acceptable (e.g. renewables projects, LBOs, nuclear, oil drilling, etc), there will be a lot of submissions to do X without any bribes at all. |
|
|
I’ll toss in some better evidence then: the Paramount lawsuit settlement that paves the way for the merger, which includes future payments for things like pro-Trump advertisements/PSAs:
https://www.foxnews.com/media/how-trump-sued-cbs-won-60-minu...
Paramount shareholders are suing over this and accusing the administration of bribery.
https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/paramount-shareholders-a...
Here’s another giant unrelated article that details the Trump administration’s shakedown system:
https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/unco...
I’ll remind everyone that it has been well established fact that Trump was basically the real estate guy for the Russian mafia in NYC before he got into politics. It isn’t some kind of strange coincidence that a lot of what he does feels mafia-like.