[eviks]

> you are judging the whole thing

That's literally the opposite of what happens, you can't judge the whole thing if you've only read 1 paragraph!

> If the first part is bad that puts the book behind every other book.

That makes no sense, you don't know the quality of other books to make that determination! What if they have much worse paragraphs in the middle? What's so special about the first one expect being helpful to the lazy judges?

> Think about judging a 3 course meal.

Don't, you just add more irrelevance her

[koliber]

In theory, you're right. But she talks about how it happens in practice. We can all sit around and talk about how this or that should work in theory, until one day we get a chance to do that one thing. And then most of us shut up because the real world is messy.

> What if they have much worse paragraphs in the middle?

Do you think a book that has a particularly bad first few pages is more or less likely to have a lot of poor content in the middle vs. a book that has a really good first few pages?

[eviks]

> And then most of us shut up because the real world is messy

That's rather ironic because you both can't do that with a fantasy of a simplistic world of "first line bad = whole book bad"

> more or less likely

In the real messy world the correct answer is "you have no clue" neither when it comes to the whole universe of books nor to the specific subset of books that were accepted for the competition.

But I'm aware of the allure of the simple nature of a fantasy world where there is a very simple way to judge the quality of any art work, and where such quality is necessarily uniform, so a tiny sample is fine.