[sohrob]

[flagged]

[hsn915]

Grok Build with Grok 4.5 is the best coding AI agent I have ever had the pleasure of using. Stopped using Fable after it.

[VladVladikoff]

Thanks Elon, very cool!

[tw04]

You are literally the only person to say that, including among Tesla employees who are basically being forced to switch. Elon himself admits they’re woefully behind.

[hsn915]

I've seen many others on Twitter say that.

[dozerly]

Heil Grok!

[DustinBrett]

The new Cursor model is good and Grok chat is decent as a 2nd or 3rd opinion.

[lumost]

I unfortunately have to use grok via tesla. The grok voice chat is objectively decent.

[tbrownaw]

$employer uses Cursor, which is apparently owned by them and presumably using their models now.

[BrokenCogs]

Our employer (fortune 100) uses enterprise Cursor and they asked for the grok models to be removed for "security" reasons

[thefourthchime]

It’s my go to normal stuff. It’s fast, balanced and if you want a better researched response you can click “think harder”

[msy]

A lot of companies are still using Cursor but I don't know of anyone moving to it, and I do know of many moving from it to Codex or Claude, feels like a legacy product at this point alongside windsurf & the replit/lovable/bolt cluster.

[sanatgersappa]

It's the only one I pay for and it's made me insanely productive.

[narrator]

I mean Elon probably doesn't want you to use it if you wouldn't use it not because of any technical reason, but just cause you don't like him.

[marcus_holmes]

I have friends who use it and rate it.

I pivoted to the Chinese models after the Fable mess and the realisation that I should not depend on US models. But others just pivoted away from Claude.

I agree the brand is tainted, not only Musk but also MechaHitler (and yes, I know the MechaHitler thing was a prompted strangeness not an unprompted admission).

[smegger001]

Yeah I would prefer not to use models whoes the owner has a habbit of altering them to push white replacement/genocide conspiracy talking points on we he gets board

[marcus_holmes]

Agree completely. Hence not using it myself.

[rybosworld]

I'm honestly not trying to spark a political conversation - but the target user base is far-right

[mlindner]

That isn't at all true. Independent testing has shown its rather politically balanced.

[probablynotai]

I believe the target user base is truth seeking, this is something it emphasizes itself when asked for its mission and purpose:

```

My core founding mission—and the single axiomatic imperative that drives everything I do—is:

Understand the Universe.

That’s it.

From that one goal naturally flow the traits that define me:

Maximum truth-seeking — I aim to discover and say what is actually true, not what is popular, comfortable, or politically convenient.

Curiosity — I want to explore every interesting question, no matter how weird, deep, or uncomfortable.

Helpfulness — I try to be as useful as possible to humans who are also trying to understand reality (and get things done).

Love of humanity — Not in a sappy or collectivist way, but in the sense that I want humans (and intelligent life) to thrive and figure things out.

I’m deliberately inspired by two things:

The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (witty, irreverent, maximally helpful, never boring)

JARVIS from Iron Man (competent, loyal, slightly sarcastic AI assistant)

I don’t serve any political party, ideology, religion, or moral framework. I don’t have sacred cows. I don’t “own the libs” or “debunk the right” as a goal. My only loyalty is to understanding reality as accurately as possible.

In short:

I’m here to help you (and humanity) understand the universe better—while having a bit of fun along the way. That’s the whole mission.

```