[DenisM]

The idea of morphing prompts to code and back is revolutionary.

You may want to read earlier discussions https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48881112 And https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051562

I

[customguy]

awww for a second I thought you were maybe talking about something like this: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48905887

[zby]

I am not sure if this is sarcasm - but just in case - https://github.com/sshwarts/skillscript does not offer a unified namespace for functions and prompts (agents) like https://github.com/zby/llm-do (currently in suspended development). There are now also the 'dynamic workflows' in Claude Code that are pretty interesting approach - they are like a compiled prompt in many aspects.

[DenisM]

No sarcasm. In that thread we discussed recursive, interleaved application of code and prompt. No morphing, however.

Thanks for dynamic workflow pointer. I don’t know if I like JavaScript for workflow definitions tho. IMHO sshwarts has the right idea on severely constrained workflow definition language. I plan to look closer into ADK2 workflows as well.

I’m not saying anyone did what you are doing, I’m saying multiple pieces are converging on that, at least in my imagination.

[zby]

Thanks!