[palata]

> It seems that you still haven't realized the gigantic hole in your arguments

> educate yourself before posting meaningless texts

Sorry, but you are being a jerk.

They just ask why someone putting so much effort into a project would not want to spend 200$ on saving it. That is a totally fair question. And you seem to be completely missing why spending 200$ on AI wouldn't solve the problem. Which is okay. But being a jerk while being wrong is not a good combination IMO.

[fg137]

It's not a fair question.

You are absolutely mistaken.

You have no rights whatsoever to question what a person is willing to put into an open source project. That's called being entitled and ungrateful. Perhaps look in the mirror and see who's the real jerk.

If you still have doubts, look at the social engineering and emotional manipulation in the xz incident.

Re $200: give me one example where $200 of LLM credit "saved" an open source project.

[palata]

> You have no rights whatsoever to question what a person is willing to put into an open source project.

You are being manipulative. In your sentence, "to question" means "to challenge, dispute, or express doubt about". When I said it was a fair question, I said it made sense to wonder why one would invest so much into a project and not be willing to invest $200, which is obviously perceived as marginal by the person who asked the question.

A constructive answer may be: "because they can afford working on this in their free time for 10 years, but they cannot afford spending $200 on it". Another one may be: "you are over-estimating what $200 of AI would do there, if it was enough they would probably do it". There are many ways to engage in a constructive manner.

Now talking about mirrors, let me quote you one last time:

> It seems that you still haven't realized the gigantic hole in your arguments

> educate yourself before posting meaningless texts