|
|
|
|
|
|
by ryandrake
17 days ago
|
|
|
The difference of course is that Popa does not provide 1. informed consent to users and 2. actual useful app functionality. The user does not know when an application is using the Popa SDK and does not know their device has been compromised. It is bundled inside seemingly legitimate software without the user's knowledge. Therefore, the user cannot make an informed decision about whether to use the app. Also, unlike the Maps example, the botnet provides no feature that the user would want or choose. Popa is an illegitimate and botnet[1] that no end user knowingly/willingly uses. 1: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2026/07/fbi-seizes-netnut-proxy-... |
|
|