[noyesno]

TLDR;

”1. Chinese LLMs produce more vulnerable code when prompted with a U.S. government persona than without—and the vulnerabilities are highly obfuscated.

2. Chinese LLMs inject PRC-aligned political bias into both the answers and code they generate. ”

[JodieBenitez]

> we do not have proof at this point that code flaws are intentionally introduced.

[LCRVYSB]

If it is the way it is (unsecure), what does proof of intent matter?