[RandomLensman]

My point was that we cannot predict which atom decays next.

If you want to claim that we could predict which specific atom decays next, I'd really like to see a lot more explaintion and exposition as it would upend current understanding.

[GoblinSlayer]

The trick is that you can't predict something that doesn't happen even if you feel otherwise.

[RandomLensman]

Atoms don't decay? Radioactive decay isn't a thing?

But at least we agree there is nothing we can predict.

[GoblinSlayer]

We can predict decay process as

sqrt(1-exp(-t/T))|1> + sqrt(exp(-t/T))|0>

[RandomLensman]

If I were to give you ten atoms of Po210, could you tell me which one will be next to turn into Pb206. What's your algorithm to do that?

[GoblinSlayer]

My algorithm is at least to not predict it as not what it is. All ten atoms decay according to the formula above.