Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by koolba 14 days ago
Is it though? Cause you can have an agent analyze the reports to filter out the wheat from the chaff.
1 comments

I suspect that is exactly what cursor did, and the agent (incorrectly) categorized this as chaff.
Ideally, they’ll be able to look back through the logs and find the original analysis from when the bug was submitted, figure out why it was incorrectly filtered, and use that to improve their automation.

The general idea of a few layers of automated triage by increasingly powerful LLMs, before finally escalating to a human engineer, seems like a reasonable way to handle a deluge of submissions. It just has to be implemented well and continuously calibrated.