[saulpw]

I hate to say it, but you're the problem. One time is better than switching, but we switch because no matter which time standard we choose, some group of people takes issue. The only way we can get one time standard is if we all let go of our highest preference and allow the second-best thing to succeed. Otherwise we'll be doomed to third-best (devolving into worst--see Indiana and Arizona and all the other carveouts within carveouts) for eternity.

[gboss]

This is why I think we have to switch. Everyone should be equally miserable

[al_borland]

> I hate to say it, but you're the problem. One time is better than switching

I’m not the problem, we agree. That’s the first thing I said in my post (thought I realize now I had a typo… “saying” = “staying”).

My concern is that if we choose a new standard that was already shown to be problematic when implemented previously, that we’ll end up reverting back in 2 years. Then it will be another 50 years before we try again.

If we go to daylight time and stick with it, I’m still happy. I just worry that people are so focused on that evening sun that they are forgetting where that time comes from and some of the issues that come with it.

[saulpw]

Okay, well said. Maybe we should try one year of each and then put it to a popular vote.

[harimau777]

I mean, I'd rather us keep switching than have perma-daylights savings time. At least then things aren't messed up for at least half of the year.