[datsci_est_2015]

Well here’s my caveat, I guess:

> as long as the interface for interacting with a cube is well-designed / well-defined

The phrase “solving a Rubik’s cube” is somehow misleading. The challenge for the LLM would seem to be more along the lines of 3d spatial reasoning, which is once again imo an interfacing problem. There’s no “pure” way to prompt an LLM with spatial information, because spatial information is not language. Creatures on earth solved spatial reasoning problems with signal processing solutions (processing light and sound; vision and echolocation).