[doubtfuluser]

I think this is an important article that provides a framework how to think and navigate what’s happening.

What upset me a bit were phrases like “This is not a slogan. It’s a framework” which immediately devalued the work for me.

I have read so much Ai generated text recently, that I developed some AI-fatigue or AI-burnout, and I’m wondering if that might hit more fields - making more humans reject Ai work.

To be clear, I still like the text and I don’t know if it was written (partially) by Ai or not - but it’s this uncanny feeling I got reading it.

[lagrange77]

> phrases like “This is not a slogan. It’s a framework” which immediately devalued the work for me

Why? Because it resembles the typical "You're not just implementing a text editor, you're reshaping the text editing landscape"?

[budududuroiu]

I've had this exact feeling about the article. I partly switched off after that paragraph

[jorisw]

But did it end up being valuable and survive this offence?

[tkel]

why is that more important to you?

[jorisw]

Because substance trumps style?

[Cthulhu_]

If it is a common AI pattern, I wonder why the developers haven't taken measures to circumvent tells like that. Unless they keep them there on purpose as like a signature or watermark.

[jackdoe]

I am starting to seriously consider switching my pi-hole from blacklist to whitelist; block everything except few domains. I am convinced now most of the text I read is either ai generated, or people who wrote it have been influenced by AI so much that they write like it.

I cant read this shit anymore.

"creating cross functional AI evaluation team to keep the company honest"

Fucking garbage.

I have an old book between me and the keyboard, and just read it while the AI is thinking, so I can read non AI words.. otherwise its like reading books by the same author over and over and over again.

I will go touch some grass now.