[strictnein]

The government already does that.

   https://api.weather.gov/ 
   https://www.noaa.gov/nodd/datasets
   https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/cdo-web/

etc etc etc

[ordersofmag]

I think the point is that there has been a push to move away from this data continuing to be available from these sources.

[counters]

There has not.

[ordersofmag]

Attempts have been made starting back in 2005 https://www.congress.gov/bill/109th-congress/senate-bill/786...

[counters]

And I dare you to find another attempt in the intervening 20 years.

Santorum's bill was laughed out of Washington. It stands alone.

[slater]

https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2024/07/noaa-pro...

[counters]

You do understand how this isn't an example of what I'm asking for, right?

In 20 years worth of history - you can't identify a single piece of legislation or a single executive action to demonstrate an ongoing threat to NOAA? You have to immediately jump to the tautology of "Project 2025 is dismantling NOAA because an article two years ago said Project 2025 was going to dismantle NOAA"?