To people who think I'm cynical (and are presumably downvoting), I present this nice example which just turned up: "Kirsten Gillibrand wants to save crypto - but Trump windfall is a political obstacle"
The ones with power, like Gillibrand, are not "oddballs". They must be seen as exponents of the central idea of the party, which is basically just stable interest on capital. They might once have opposed the allocation of capital into crypto, but if capital is invested in crypto now, then crypto must be defended. Marx's quip about the Tories in England feels appropriate:
"The Tories in England long imagined that they were enthusiastic about monarchy, the church and the beauties of the old English Constitution, until the day of danger wrung from them the confession that they are enthusiastic only about ground rent."
You can find a Democrat on both sides of every issue. It's a big tent party, and houses a lot of oddballs.