| I think AIs generally "like" the API surface exposed by Shirei. They seem to understand it pretty well and are able to "vibe code" any kind of UI you ask of them using this framework. To your general point though, yes, there's a lot of uncertainty about what things it makes sense to build in the AI era. I don't have good answers for what would make sense for 10 years down the road, but at this point of time, I think a project like this actually makes perfect sense. Now that AI can write the code for us, we need better frameworks and libraries, because a lot of what we have now is quite honestly slop. You could say that you could get AI to maintain 3 separate codebases of the same application UI, each one targeted to a different platform, and the AI will maintain the feature parity and you won't have to worry about it. For now, AI can take care of coding, but it does not relieve you of having to pay attention to things. If you create 2 or 3 code bases for the different platforms you target, the maintenance burden still falls on you. But I don't know for how long the situation will remain like this. Last year I did not think I'd be using AI for coding. I dug up a few tweets I posted last year saying that LLMs have hit a plateau and will stop improving, and that AI coding is a scam being promoted by charlatans. |