|
|
|
|
|
by balder1991
16 days ago
|
|
I’d like to recommend people to read the “Programming as a theory building” article and why the code itself isn’t enough to understand the whole context of a complex project. Every time you work in a complex software project, you have all the context in your head about what you must take into consideration. LLMs don’t, you have to explain every little detail to them, but there’s no telling where it stops: do you have to explain X to it or is it in the training already? When you try to shape how a LLM should behave and what it should know, you end up writing a Bible of relevant context that’s increasingly difficult to maintain as well, often with outdated or contradictory information, and it is still free to ignore things you have written and proceed however it wants. That’s why so many people only feel comfortable giving the LLM some limited task to do, because you can judge if that specific task needs just enough context that it can handle by itself. |
|