[realxrobau]

You're aware that the article you posted is full of sovcit antivaxers?

The reason the case was dismissed was because the requirement was removed.

The case was reopened on appeal due to the rules being temporarily re-established.

Anything else is nonsense. This is spelled out in the article but wrapped with a bunch of whatifs and maybes and possiblies.

If your hypothesis was correct, then NOTHING is a vaccine.

[chasil]

Do I care?

[realxrobau]

Well you're the one making the claim that a vaccine needs to block infections permanently, so I guess you do?