[tdkx21]

When algorithms are removed, quality filters are eliminated, which makes it possible for spam and low-effort articles to overrun the chronological feed and quickly obscure high-quality information. In order to get their writing found and read, authors must rely extensively on outside media and audiences because outstanding work sinks so rapidly without an engagement engine to sustain it, which is a problem. But otherwise it's great.

[8by3]

So far tuhat's content has been very high quality, the ~1000 word minimum and lack of public comments make its use for spammers not very appealing. And a user only gets one post per day listed on the homepage. There are some more moderation / spam detection tools built in to remove "bad" users.

Additionally for non English users, the language specific pages eg. https://tuhat.net/es see lower traffic.

[tdkx21]

not against it and I totally appreciate it but just wanted to point out what I thought, thanks for mentioning the platform has somewhat tools to prevent low-quality content on the site