Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ozgrakkurt 16 days ago
Andrew essentially wrote that “bun code was bad anyway”.

And also he implied he doesn’t even want to engage with anything relating to this since Jarred is toxic and there is no value in the debate.

I think these points are fairly clear from his blog post

1 comments

> And also he implied he doesn’t even want to engage with anything relating to this since Jarred is toxic and there is no value in the debate.

If he doesn't want to get involved, then why even write this piece?

He essentially was having a tantrum
You're allowed to have a tantrum when a 10 figure company is doing a marketing stunt and shitting on your life's work to do so.

If you spend X amount of years building something, and someone you know to be a mediocre dev trashes it in an effort to enrich themselves, you're allowed to expose the things you know about them. End of story. I wish more people would throw a tantrum. We should expose all these charleton and thieves.

Kinda like how the Bun team spent years building their product then this guy trashes it? Except for real?

And he didn't "expose" anything but gossip.