|
|
|
|
|
by defrost
16 days ago
|
|
It was a good deal that constrained enrichment, allowed human inspectors to roam and legitimately raise complaint if kept from chasing leads, permitted installation of tamper resistant / tamper revealing fixed monitoring instruments. It addressed neither missiles, late library fees, digital piracy, etc. It was flawed in the same sense a car is flawed for not being able to pull a 820 Flexi-Coil 18 metre bar, with a 2320 tow behind Flexi-Coil airseeder across a muddy field. ( eg: outside of design scope ) Worth noting also - not just a US deal - a number of other countries had input on the deal and on inspections. |
|