Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by adrianN 16 days ago
There is little hope for that as long as driving is heavily subsidized.
1 comments

How is driving subsidized?
By providing free or cheap parking for people that don't live there. Urban land is extremely expensive and parking generally doesn't cost what it should, other land uses would provide a lot more revenue. Parking in US cities is greatly over provisioned to make life easy for suburbanites, destroying urban fabric.
Massive ongoing investment into roads. EV incentives that would pay for 3-4 ebikes outright. Big 3 bailout. Cash for clunkers. Impact fees from developers towards roads. As others said parking requirements. There is so much beyond that too.
> Massive ongoing investment into roads

Okay, let's stop spending money on roads then.

How are you at riding your bike through mud? Pretty good? Got nice chunky tyres?

Road wear increases with the fourth power of axle weight iirc. Bike paths are orders of magnitude cheaper and need a lot less space.
> Road wear increases with the fourth power of axle weight iirc

That's not actually true, and the paper that describes the "fourth power" thing even says that right up front.

If you massively oversimplify the model so that you've got all vehicles fitted with infinitely hard bicycle tyres on a perfectly smooth surface, it kind of works out, but not quite.

Interesting! Nevertheless I believe it is true that bike and pedestrian paths are much cheaper to construct and maintain than roads for cars and trucks.
> How are you at riding your bike through mud? Pretty good? Got nice chunky tyres?

Bicyclists were the ones to first push for paved roads:

* https://www.history.com/articles/good-roads-movement-bicycli...

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_American_Bicyclists#...

One example is the requirement to have parking spaces.