[SR2Z]

No but it's a useful shorthand to describe a type of bad writing.

I also think that people should focus on substance and not if AI was used, but AI writes like shit and I find myself retching a bit when I have to read long AI-written documents. Do they say something useful? Maybe, but when my eyes are glazing over because it's just so exhausting trying to parse what's written, I can't tell.

I certainly think less of people when they have such poor taste that they think writing like that is acceptable.

[jasonlotito]

This is just an AI comment masquerading as not trying to prove a point.

[SR2Z]

Since you didn't address the substance, I guess we'll never know :)

[aeon_ai]

I’m as pro AI as any.

Slop is slop. When the “it works but isn’t great” phrases end up slipping into a strong conceptual core, it compromises the perception of the ideas.

Perhaps our AI will cater to us by rewriting the content we read, and each of us intermediate all communication with systems that make that slop bearable.

Or perhaps, we learn that we kinda still need to give a shit when writing to land on the perception we’re trying to create within our readers

[wqaatwt]

To be fair internet (or rather shovelware websites like Medium) were already flooded by crap articles based on a set of templates. Of course the issue is that LLMs are actually better than the robot-humans who used to write them so now it takes more time until you figure whether it’s worth reading or not..