|
|
|
|
|
|
by pdimitar
20 days ago
|
|
|
IMO from the info given in the OP it seems to me that they never actually needed Haskell, not playing to its strengths anyway, especially if they felt Python was an adequate replacement -- which it absolutely is not if you value the compile-time finding of bugs, better known as "a strong static typing system". But that's a separate discussion vector. |
|
|