It is not anti-White racist, but facts. It is white abusing black, not the other way around. How can you have the skin so thin with something like this? For fuck sake.
Statistical inference is not established fact. I'm not defending parent comment above, but to be clear, it's not actually established as a fact that "Maria" was black, right? "Maria" isn't even her real name.
It very explicitly guesses that she is black, based solely on statistical inference.
From TFA: "Statistics suggest that Maria was undoubtedly poor and, most likely, Black."
To read this as established fact is analogous to asserting as established fact that if you roll a six-sided die, you will certainly get a number <= 4. Probable, but not fact.
A careful read also reveals that none of the woman's actual identifying information was revealed, including her name, for her own privacy:
"We’ll call her Maria, the most common female name in Brazil, because authorities have not disclosed her real name in order to protect her identity."
Follow-up edit: thank you for your correction, I appreciate the epistemic humility and good-faith dialogue.
Selective capitalisation of different races (white cf. Black) is a common dog whistle employed by anti-Whites.
Are you sure you want to start using statistical assumptions as "facts" in crime reports? That is going to backfire very badly for your disproportionately black offenders...
>facts
Statistical inference is not established fact. I'm not defending parent comment above, but to be clear, it's not actually established as a fact that "Maria" was black, right? "Maria" isn't even her real name.