|
Exactly. "No explanation why the price would have soared so high" is the exact reason why Bitcoin will have issues trying to tie into the larger financial structure without series difficulties. Ever seen Trading Places? The stock market scene at the end where they make a killing is based (fundamentally, forgetting about the fraud) on the fact that the value of the Frozen OJ drops to 25% of its former value in a single moment. The normal financial system has things in place, both internally and externally, so that (fraud not withstanding) such a rapid (de)valuation increase doesn't happen regularly (when it does, you get 1873, 1929, 2008, etc). Bitcoin doesn't have the internal measures, as it isn't issued by a central authority, which can alter the amount of currency in the market at will. As such, it would need some many external controls, such as say a 24-hour transaction period, to be useable on the open market, which would in turn make it unreasonable for the open market. And if you're wondering why Bitcoin is being seriously studied by economists, that's why. No one has seen anything like this ever, and what happens, and how that can influence general economic models, is fascinating. |
What would a 24-hour transaction period do exactly? Bitcoin is supposed to be used like cash. If you spend it then it's gone, most immediately, and if you value it highly then you keep it in a safe.
Price goes up, price goes down, safe is still safe. Until it gets cracked, then if you're a real player, the market is flooded with (illegally obtained, but generally not really tainted and otherwise fairly easy to clean) pile of coins.
I'm no economist, but I understand "redistribution of large collections of wealth can lead to rapid deflation without countermeasures." That's equally harmful to big-time owners as well as little guys.
We should be thinking about the countermeasures.