[autoexec]

> That’s a misconception. Glass does not flow over time;...Physicists calculate that it would take longer than the age of the universe for room-temperature window glass to visibly deform under gravity.

so then it does flow over time, just not on a scale where it matters to us.

[rsfern]

But this is true for lots of solids, not just glass. Consider creep deformation [0] which is deformation mediated by diffusion of defects in solid materials. It’s a big problem in metal turbine blades, it limits the maximum usable temperature to well below the melting point.

The physical mechanism would be similar in glass flowing in this way, so I don’t think evidence of glass flowing like this should make us think of it as a liquid instead of an amorphous solid

0: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Creep_(deformation)

[klustregrif]

How do you go from “calculate that it would take longer than the age of the universe for room-temperature window glass to visibly deform” to “so the. It does flow”?

Glass flows a higher temperatures where it does act like a liquid, you can study glass blowing for examples, however no, room temperature glass is not a liquid and does not flow, for any practical definition of what flowing is.