|
|
|
|
|
by westurner
17 days ago
|
|
As well. Someday costed opcodes and sharded redundancy for all of this; > No search needed because the problem is discrete and small. If an algorithm selects according to rank, there's a cost/score/fitness/survival/error function (that assumes or imposes a distance metric to make a metric space). Awhile back I had to match exterior paint to printed paint swatches and I'm stereotypically not good at colors, so finally I arrived at just A/B; this one or this one and discard. |
|
Hmm, noted.
> If an algorithm selects according to rank, there's a cost/score/fitness/survival/error function.
- Yes, what I'm saying is that frugon has a small enough candidate pool that it can all be evaluated at the same time. It doesn't need to search through it.
> Awhile back I had to match exterior paint to printed paint swatches and I'm stereotypically not good at colors, so finally I arrived at just A/B; this one or this one and discard.
- This is exactly the shape the judge prompt takes in frugon.
See: src/frugon/measure.py
Then search: JUDGE_PROMPT_TEMPLATE