Here's are a few links to several resources about the state of safety at the frontier LLM models' companies of origin. The first uses shorter sentences and has further supporting links.
Hopefully those with provide you with an easier to comprehend, "synthetic" (sic) measurement of the risks that are unavoidable in the 'product' under consideration.
TLDR; the safety at every commercial LLM scores at or below a C+. I don't believe anyone serious can honestly believe that the founders of this 'product' are capable of reinforcing security that does not exist in any of the models they may choose to utilize.
Also, the "Shame on you" statement was directed exclusively at the founders of this product and people who would intentionally expose children in their stewardship to these dangers.
If that is not you, then my honest apologies if it seemed directed at you. That was not my intent.
If that includes you, and you couldn't grok the concepts in my rant; we have nothing more to talk about.
Hopefully those with provide you with an easier to comprehend, "synthetic" (sic) measurement of the risks that are unavoidable in the 'product' under consideration.
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/320191/20260711/openai-lo...
TLDR; the safety at every commercial LLM scores at or below a C+. I don't believe anyone serious can honestly believe that the founders of this 'product' are capable of reinforcing security that does not exist in any of the models they may choose to utilize.
https://futureoflife.org/ai-safety-index-summer-2026/
https://www.techtimes.com/articles/318351/20260614/chatgpt-f...
Hope this helps.
Also, the "Shame on you" statement was directed exclusively at the founders of this product and people who would intentionally expose children in their stewardship to these dangers.
If that is not you, then my honest apologies if it seemed directed at you. That was not my intent.
If that includes you, and you couldn't grok the concepts in my rant; we have nothing more to talk about.