|
|
|
|
|
|
by geokon
18 days ago
|
|
|
My feel would be that 2.4 has the advantage of being much longer range and there are plenty of sources for 2.4 - if you wanted to look at back-scatter and not just sources of emission. The primary demo of this piece of equipment is looking at radiation sources, but as you guys show there are plenty of other possible applications. I feel like since 2.4Ghz stuff has been around for ages.. the stuff should be much cheaper? Just a guess though :) Would be curious to know what the reality looks like And cool to see you guys are from Santa Barbara. Lots of relevant talent there :) |
|
|