| I agree with the premise of the article. For example I've been using Jujutsu exclusively (as a Git frontend) for years and I don't think about it, I just use it. I reflected on this couple of years. It's existence is completely transparent to me. I, however, don't agree with sibling commenter that it's a function of time spent with X though. As a counter example: Emacs was my go to editor for 15+ years, last 2 years - because reasons - I was switching between Neovim, Helix, Emacs, Kakoune. 6 months ago I settled with Kakoune. Even with many years in Emacs, I still tweaked and tuned it. There was always something to do, change, understand. I actively thought about Emacs. With Kakoune after initial "set me up" phase, it's just as transparent as Jujutsu. Sure, I made complex plugins (for searching, highlighting unbalanced parenthesis and even a GUI wrapper called Kakvide). But the difference is that in Emacs the driver was the tool itself and in Kakoune it's always "I wonder if I can do X". And so I believe that Kakoune is better tool than Emacs as it's more transparent to me even with a big time difference in usage. |
Also one thing that intrigues me about Kakoune is the possibility of writing CLI utils in whatever language and then calling them from Kakoune. The same can be done from Emacs but generally you'd go for Elisp instead.
I've also found I miss fancier text decoration like subscripts, bold, italics, underline and mixing monospace with another font when not using Emacs.