Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hunter2_ 18 days ago
> just read an extra second [...] accidentally trigger watchdogs

Well, this seems to touch heavily on the concern: if your job normally takes 0.1s and costs $100, it could accidentally be considered to have taken 1.1s and therefore cost $1100. This is quite contrived, but if you consider that some people put very infrequent cron jobs at the top of the hour (which isn't typically the best idea, but I digress) and it might start just ahead of what the billing system considers to be the top of the hour, theoretically there's something to this concern.

1 comments

Yeah definitely but tbh a one-off expense at that scale while unfortunate isn't really lethal.

And tbh if you are performing ops at a scale where that level of expense is present it's nobody's fault but your own if your orchestration is cronjobs on the 58th second of the 59th minute of the last hour of the year.

And at any time scale past the order of seconds, this is a small enough time jump that it's a rounding error in ops expenses.