|
|
|
|
|
by jplusequalt
18 days ago
|
|
>It's on the luddites to demonstrate evidence of harm, if they want some use of technology banned. Here's one study from last year (1000 students) [1]. They showed that improved outcomes with AI are short term, and likely a result of AI doing the work for the student. Their methodology involved a test without the use of AI at a later date, and one of the groups who used AI tested much worse than the control group who did not use AI during learning. Moreover, a tertiary group that used a specially trained AI for tutoring showed no improvement in testing outcomes over the control group. [1] Bastani, H., Bastani, O., Sungu, A., Ge, H., Kabakçı, Ö., & Mariman, R. (2025). "Generative AI Without Guardrails Can Harm Learning: Evidence from High School Mathematics." PNAS, 122. PNAS |
|