| Balloon-lofted drones seem more likely as a means for even a minor military power to strike deep within a country. These can be launched in mass, cheaply. They're difficult to detect and/or distinguish (weather balloons are already common), and easy to cloud with dummy balloons, perhaps dangling aluminium paper to enhance radar signatures. The drones themselves could use optical+inertial guidance, and have either minimal propulsion or be entirely glide-based. Given prevailing high-altitude winds (generally west-to-east in mid-northern latitudes) strikes could be launched many thousands of miles from targets with minimal or no fuel / propulsive storage use. "Ukraine uses military balloons to deliver drone strikes inside Russia" <https://english.nv.ua/russian-war/ukraine-uses-military-ball...> "Ukraine Revives Military Balloons for Modern Warfare Needs: Report"
<https://thedefensepost.com/2026/02/18/ukraine-balloons-moder...> Japan used a similar strategy, though to no strategic or tactical effect (six civilians were killed in Oregon), during WWII:' Fu-Go balloon bomb
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fu-Go_balloon_bomb> In 1945, a Japanese Balloon Bomb Killed Six Americans, Five of Them Children, in Oregon
<https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/1945-japanese-balloon...> |